Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crocodylia has an extensive epithelial pneumatic space in the middle ear, paratympanic sinus system. Although fossil and extant crocodylian paratympanic sinus systems have been studied recently using the computed tomography (CT) and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction data, due to the soft tissue nature of the pneumatic system and presence of its surrounding soft tissue structures, some boundaries, and definitions of each extension remain ambiguous. We describe the comprehensive paratympanic sinus system in posthatched alligator using soft tissue enhanced CT data with 3D reconstructions. The data are compared to the available data to discuss the ontogenetic pattern in alligator. We introduce further divided entities of the pneumatic system based on their associated bony and soft tissue structures and epithelial membrane and clarify the pneumatic terminologies. We then re-visit the potential homology of the paratympanic sinus in Archosauria. Epithelial boundaries of the ventral portion of the pneumatic system from the histological data suggest that the dual origin of the basioccipital diverticulum derived from the tympanic sinus and basicranial diverticulum medially. The presence of the epithelial boundary and pneumatic changes in ontogeny suggests that the middle ear may function differently in developmental stages. Lastly, a morphogenetic tree is constructed to help future work of comparative developmental studies of the paratympanic sinus system between crocodiles and birds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".