A Global Spatial-Temporal Land Use Regression Model for Nitrogen Dioxide Air Pollution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO) recently reduced its health guideline for Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2) to annual and 24-hr means of 10 µg/m 3 (5.3 ppb) and 25 µg/m 3 (13.3 ppb). NO 2 is a criteria air pollutant that varies spatiotemporally at fine resolutions due to its relatively short lifetime (~hours) and current models have limited ability to capture this variation. To advance global exposure estimates, we created a daily global land use regression (LUR) model with 50 x 50 m 2 spatial resolution using 5.7 million daily air monitor averages collected from 8,250 monitor locations. In cross-validation, the model captured 47%, 59%, and 63% of daily, monthly, and annual global NO 2 variation. Daily, monthly, and annual root mean square error were 6.8, 5.0, and 4.4 ppb and absolute bias were 46%, 30%, and 21%, respectively. The final model has 11 variables, including road density and built environments with fine (30 m or less) spatial resolution and meteorological and satellite data with daily temporal resolution. Major roads and satellite-based estimates of NO 2 were consistently the strongest predictors in all regions. Daily model estimates from 2005-2019 are available 1 and can be used for global risk assessments and health studies, particularly in countries without NO 2 monitoring. Short synopsis: This is the first global NO 2 model with daily temporal and 50m spatial resolution, valuable for capturing NO 2 variation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".