MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Game Theoretic Reinforcement Learning Framework For Industrial Internet of Things

2022· article· en· W4280560342 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tai Manh Ho, Mohamed Cheriet

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMitacs
KeywordsComputer scienceReinforcement learningDistributed computingAutomationLow latency (capital markets)WirelessCluster analysisRoboticsComputer networkArtificial intelligenceRobotEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fifth-generation (5G) wireless net-work provides high-rate, ultra-low latency, and high-reliability connections that can meet the industrial IoT requirements in factory automation especially for swarm robotics communication. In this paper, we address 5G service provisioning in an automated warehouse scenario where swarm robotics is controlled by an industrial controller that provides routing and job instructions over the 5G network. Leveraging the co-ordinated multipoint (CoMP), we formulate a joint CoMP clustering and 5G ultra-reliable low-latency communication (URLLC) beamforming design problem to control the robots that move around the automated warehouse for goods storage with the planed reference tracks. Traditional iterative optimization approaches are impractical in such dynamic wireless environments due to high computational time. We propose a game-theoretic CoMP clustering algorithm combined with the Proximal Policy Optimization method to obtain a stationary solution closed to that of the exhaustive search algorithm considered as the global optimal solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.825

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC)Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207