Observational Study of Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Severe Upper Limb Impairment After Stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<h3>Background and Objectives</h3> It is difficult to predict poststroke outcome for individuals with severe motor impairment because both clinical tests and corticospinal tract (CST) microstructure may not reliably indicate severe motor impairment. Here, we test whether imaging biomarkers beyond the CST relate to severe upper limb (UL) impairment poststroke by evaluating white matter microstructure in the corpus callosum (CC). In an international, multisite hypothesis-generating observational study, we determined if (1) CST asymmetry index (CST-AI) can differentiate between individuals with mild-moderate and severe UL impairment and (2) CC biomarkers relate to UL impairment within individuals with severe impairment poststroke. We hypothesized that CST-AI would differentiate between mild-moderate and severe impairment, but CC microstructure would relate to motor outcome for individuals with severe UL impairment. <h3>Methods</h3> Seven cohorts with individual diffusion imaging and motor impairment (Fugl-Meyer Upper Limb) data were pooled. Hand-drawn regions-of-interest were used to seed probabilistic tractography for CST (ipsilesional/contralesional) and CC (prefrontal/premotor/motor/sensory/posterior) tracts. Our main imaging measure was mean fractional anisotropy. Linear mixed-effects regression explored relationships between candidate biomarkers and motor impairment, controlling for observations nested within cohorts, as well as age, sex, time poststroke, and lesion volume. <h3>Results</h3> Data from 110 individuals (30 with mild-moderate and 80 with severe motor impairment) were included. In the full sample, greater CST-AI (i.e., lower fractional anisotropy in the ipsilesional hemisphere, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and larger lesion volume (<i>p</i> = 0.139) were negatively related to impairment. In the severe subgroup, CST-AI was not reliably associated with impairment across models. Instead, lesion volume and CC microstructure explained impairment in the severe group beyond CST-AI (<i>p</i>9s < 0.010). <h3>Discussion</h3> Within a large cohort of individuals with severe UL impairment, CC microstructure related to motor outcome poststroke. Our findings demonstrate that CST microstructure does relate to UL outcome across the full range of motor impairment but was not reliably associated within the severe subgroup. Therefore, CC microstructure may provide a promising biomarker for severe UL outcome poststroke, which may advance our ability to predict recovery in individuals with severe motor impairment after stroke.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".