Electromagnetic characteristic estimation on spiral antennas through AOI, ML, and AI
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this study, a method that is able to estimate the electromagnetic characteristic of spiral antennas was proposed and realized through consecutive procedures of automatic optical inspection (AOI), machine learning (ML), and artificial intelligence (AI), providing a solution to smart manufacturing. Two-arm self-complementary Archimedean spiral antennas (SCASAs) were introduced as examination targets with pattern distortions from potential process variations, in which bulges and neckings were mathematically generated to imitate uncontrollable ink rheology in printed and flexible electronics, covering the unexplored parts in previous works. The SCASAs in the training group were fabricated by standard printed circuit board procedures, and their pattern integrity in terms of line edge roughness (LER) and coupling frequency were collected through AOI for ML as the feature and label, respectively. The established AI model was based on Gaussian process regression with covariance function of exponential that showed the smallest root-mean-square-error and the largest coefficient of determination through iterative lazy-learning. By feeding the LERs of the SCASAs into the testing group, their corresponding coupling frequencies were estimated by the established AI model with high confidence level. Good linearity between the estimated and measured responses indicated that a reliable AI model and procedure were built, which outperforms existing methods that are unable to project off-line active characteristics of microelectronic components from their in-line pattern integrities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it