Estimation of Pb Content Using Reflectance Spectroscopy in Farmland Soil near Metal Mines, Central China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The contamination of farmlands with hazardous metals from mining puts the safety of agricultural commodities at risk. For remediation, it is crucial to map the spatial distribution of contaminated soil. Typical sampling-based procedures are time-consuming and labor-intensive. The use of visible, near-infrared, and short-wave infrared reflectance (VNIR-SWIR) spectroscopy to detect soil heavy metal pollution is an alternative. With the aim of investigating a methodology of detecting the most sensitive bands using VNIR-SWIR spectra to find lead (Pb) anomalies in agriculture soil near mining activities, the area in Xiaoqinling Mountain, downstream from a series of active gold mines, was selected to test the feasibility of utilizing VNIR-SWIR spectroscopy to map soil Pb. A total of 115 soil samples were collected for laboratory Pb analysis and spectral measurement. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) was adopted to estimate the soil Pb content by building the prediction model, and the model was optimized by finding the optimal number of bands involved. The spatial distribution of Pb concentration was mapped using the ordinary kriging (OK) interpolation method. This study found that five spectral bands (522 nm, 1668 nm, 2207 nm, 2296 nm, and 2345 nm) were sensitive to soil Pb content. The optimized prediction model’s coefficient of determination (R2), residual prediction deviation (RPD), and root mean square error (RMSE) were 0.711, 1.860, and 0.711 ln(mg/kg), respectively. Additionally, the result of OK interpolation was convincing and accurate (R2 = 0.775, RMSE = 0.328 ln(mg/kg)), comparing maps from estimated and ground truth data. This study proves that it is feasible to use VNIR-SWIR spectral data for in situ estimation of the soil Pb content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".