MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280571951 · doi:10.18280/jesa.550205

Adhesion Control for Freight Train Based on Improved Sliding Mode Extremum Seeking Algorithm and Barrier Lyapunov Function

2022· article· en· W4280571951 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jing He, Changfan Zhang, Gang Huang, Yishan Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLubricants and Their Additives
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsLyapunov functionSliding mode controlControl theory (sociology)Particle swarm optimizationMode (computer interface)Nonlinear systemTraction (geology)Computer scienceAdhesionController (irrigation)CreepComponent (thermodynamics)EngineeringAlgorithmControl (management)Materials scienceArtificial intelligencePhysicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adhesion control system is an essential component for a freight train, which aims to optimize its performance of traction, the design of the adhesion control system remains a significant challenge. One of the main challenges is the optimal creep-speed is difficult to acquire in real-time, the other one is the parameters of resistance were not available in advance. Meanwhile, adhesion is a nonlinear dynamical process. In this paper, an improved sliding mode extremum seeking virtual sensors is proposed for the issue of acquiring the optimal creep-speed in real-time; a particle swarm algorithm (PSO)-based estimation method is proposed for the issue of uncertain resistance parameters; and finally, an adhesion controller is designed based on the barrier Lyapunov concept.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicLubricants and Their AdditivesFrench-language works237,207