MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280575208 · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.05.019

Increases in human papillomavirus vaccine coverage over 12 months among a community-recruited cohort of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Canada

2022· article· en· W4280575208 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Catharine Chambers, Shelley L. Deeks, Rinku Sutradhar, Joseph Cox, Alexandra de Pokomandy, Troy Grennan, Trevor Hart, Gilles Lambert, David Moore, François Coutlée, Daniel Grace, Ramandip Grewal, Jody Jollimore, Nathan J. Lachowsky, Rosane Nisenbaum, Gina Ogilvie, Chantal Sauvageau, Darrell H. S. Tan, Ann N. Burchell

Bibliographic record

VenueVaccine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalAIDS VancouverToronto Metropolitan UniversityCommunity Based Research CentreInstitut National de Santé Publique du QuébecMcGill UniversityInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesToronto Public HealthSante MontrealBC Centre for Disease ControlGovernment of Nova ScotiaUniversity of TorontoDalhousie UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaPublic Health Ontario
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeDemographyVaccinationCohortLogistic regressionHuman papillomavirusMen who have sex with menGerontologyImmunologyInternal medicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueVaccineSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207