An Elastic Sort of Love: The PUSH.PULL of QTBIPOC Cabaret and Performance Online
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article revient sur le festival de performances virtuelles PUSH.PULL: Intersections of QTBIPOC Cabaret and Performance Art, qui s’est déroulé sur six mois pendant la pandémie de covid-19. Le festival mettait à l’affiche des évènements multidisciplinaires sondant les développements récents et intersectionnels dans les pratiques de performance et de cabaret d’artistes queers, trans, noir·e·s, autochtones, racialisé·e·s et fems aux corps et aux sexualités diverses. Ce compte rendu cherche à mettre en lumière l’éthos ontologique radical de la performance cultivé par les commissaires du festival – une politique sans complexe et libératrice de l’éros, de la joie et de la célébration de l’amour de soi grâce à des performances QTBIPOC –, en même temps que les difficultés et les limites attribuables à un public virtuel sur Zoom et aux formats de diffusion vidéo en continu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.023 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".