MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 158: Burden And Predictors Of Mortality And Major Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes In Heart Failure Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients Admitted With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

2022· article· en· W4280583957 on OpenAlexaff
Kartik Dhaduk, Viralkumar Patel, Jyoti Verma, Bhavyasri Merugu, Harroop Singh Klair, Roshan Dhakal, Ravi Shingala, Zarna Bambhroliya, Bisharah Rizvi, Akhil Jain, Rupak Desai

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHorizon Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineARDSHeart failureEjection fractionInternal medicineHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionPopulationCardiologyAcute decompensated heart failureEmergency medicineLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Relation between Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are understudied and the data on these two concomitantly is lacking in the literature. Therefore, we sought to assess the burden and predictors of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and all-cause mortality in ARDS patients with HFpEF. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used to identify patients with HFpEF (after excluding patients with heart failure reduced ejection fraction) who required inpatient hospitalization for ARDS. Administrative ICD10 codes were used to identify the population of interest. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the predictors of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in the selected cohort. Results: Of 28,731,562 hospital admissions, 3,010 (0.14%) patients were admitted with ARDS and had HFpEF. Of those patients, 1,095 (36.4%) had all-cause mortality, and 1,415 (47.0%) had MACCE. In multivariate regression analysis, older age (OR 3.60, CI 1.40-9.28), 26-50 th quartile income (OR 2.10, CI 1.13-3.91), urban hospital admissions (OR 2.19, CI 1.20-4.01) as well as comorbidities such as coagulopathy (OR 1.77, CI 1.09-2.88), fluid and electrolyte imbalance (OR 1.65, CI 1.05-2.60), prior CABG (OR 2.99, CI 1.19-7.47), need for mechanical ventilation (OR 2.18, CI 1.12-4.23) were significant predictors of all-cause mortality. In our analysis, chronic pulmonary disease, valvular heart disease, hypertension, smoking, obesity were not significant predictors. The result of our analysis is reported in Table 1. Conclusion: These results suggest HFpEF remains important comorbidity in ARDS patients. Here, we identified predictors of poor outcomes in this patient population which may help physicians to identify the high-risk patients and decrease mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and OutcomesSame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207