MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280586201 · doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwac056.061

LDL goal as a risk factor target in the post-intervention outpatient cardiology population

2022· article· en· W4280586201 on OpenAlexaffabout
M Mustafa, N Sanmugathas, Kelli McIntosh, Nomesh Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsLakeridge Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicinePercutaneous coronary interventionCoronary artery diseaseCardiologyPopulationConventional PCIConcordanceOutpatient clinicMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The relationship between an acute coronary event and cholesterol levels has been immensely researched, specifically the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) component of cholesterol. According to the Canadian guidelines, LDL cholesterol should be below 1.8 mmol/L if the patient has suffered an acute cardiac event. The European guidelines suggests that LDL target concentration should be below 1.4 mmol/L if the patient has had a previous cardiac event. European guidelines also lowered the LDL recommendations to less than 1 mmol/L if the patient has had 2 previous cardiac event in the previous 2 years. Purpose Assess the concordance of one Canadian cardiology clinic to the European LDL guidelines in patients with coronary artery disease. Methods Patients were randomly selected from a single centre outpatient Cardiology practice between January and June 2021. All patients were selected by 1 researcher. The patients selected must have been diagnosed with coronary artery disease by Angiography and undergone intervention in the form of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). The blood cholesterol levels were evaluated before and after intervention. Results 101 patients were randomly selected for this study. Data encompassed 83 males and 18 females ages 43 to 88. Before the intervention, 15 patients had an LDL level below 1.4 mmol/L, 29 patients had an LDL level below 1.8 mmol/L. After the intervention, the number of patients with LDL <1.4 mmol/L was 50 and LDL<1.8 was 85. This population was divided by risk factors and the LDL levels were compared before and after intervention. 9 patients were known to be smokers, their LDL levels were on average 2.73 mmol/L before intervention and 1.3 mmol/L after intervention. 31 patients were known diabetic, their LDL levels were on average 2.15 mmol/L before intervention and 1.43 mmol/L after intervention. 69 patients had hypertension, their LDL levels were 2.36 mmol/L before intervention and 1.46 mmol/L after intervention. Of the 30 patient who had a positive family history, the LDL on average was 2.39 mmol/L before intervention and 1.84 mmol/L after intervention. Positive family history was contingent on having an immediate female relative with age <65 or immediate male relative with age <55 having had a cardiac event or coronary intervention. Conclusions The number of individuals on appropriate cholesterol medications after intervention increased thereby reducing the LDL concentration. The data shows that in a sample of the typical Canadian population, 84% of patients were adequately managed after a coronary artery intervention according to the Canadian guidelines. According to the UK guidelines, only 29.5% are being adequately managed. The North American guidelines will likely incorporate the new LDL targets into upcoming revisions and therefore more aggressive risk factor management will be required to meet the new target goals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Preventive CardiologySame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207