Bibliographic record
Abstract
Was there ever such a thing as Minoan monumental statuary? There is no direct evidence. The terracotta figures from Kea (see below, p. 218), as much as 1.6 m tall, have no real Cretan precursors: the largest Protopalatial figurines, from Petsophas and Sklaverochori, are fragmentary and hardly surpass 70 cm, while the mould for a life-size bronze hand from Phaistos is difficult to interpret (see above, p. 112). Evans believed that the bronze hairlocks from the palace of Knossos formed part of the headdress of a colossal wooden statue; it has since been shown that in fact they most likely belong to rather small wooden figurines (R. Hägg, AA 1983, 543–9). The discovery at Archanes (Anemospilia) of large terracotta feet has nevertheless revived the debate: are these simply votive feet, as known from other examples on Crete and Kea, or should we see them as supports intended to slot into a wooden statue (xoanon) that has since decayed?.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".