MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280601534 · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101143

What is next for the neurobiology of temperament, personality and psychopathology?

2022· article· en· W4280601534 on OpenAlexaff
Ирина Трофимова, Sahil Bajaj, С. А. Башкатов, James Blair, Anika Brandt, Raymond C. K. Chan, Benjamin Clemens, Philip J. Corr, Maria Cyniak‐Cieciura, L.Y. Demidova, Courtney A. Filippi, M.I. Garipova, Ute Habel, Nathaniel Haines, Nadja Heym, Kirsty Hunter, Nancy Aaron Jones, Jonathan W. Kanen, А. V. Kirenskaya, Veena Kumari, Sabrina Lenzoni, Simon S. Y. Lui, Avantika Mathur, Neil McNaughton, Krystal D. Mize, Erik M. Mueller, Petra Netter, Katharina Paul, Thomas Plieger, Preethi Premkumar, Adrian Raine, Martin Reuter, Trevor W. Robbins, D.V. Samylkin, З. И. Сторожева, William Sulis, Alexander Sumich, Emilio A. Valadez, Jan Wacker, Lisa Wagels, Lingling Wang, Bogdan Zawadzki, Alan D. Pickering

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultidisciplinary approachTemperamentPsychologyPsychopathologyPersonalityNeurochemistryTheme (computing)PsychotherapistClinical psychologyNeurosciencePsychoanalysisNeurologySociologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.010
Scholarly communication0.0070.017
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.206
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Behavioral SciencesSame topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207