PARASITE FAUNA OF WOOD BISON (BISON BISON ATHABASCAE RHOADS, 1897) LIVING IN THE UST’-BUОTОMА NURSERY, LENA PILLARS NATURE PARK, REPUBLIC OF SAKHA (YAKUTIA)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The results of the study are presented on the parasite fauna of the wood bison from the Ust’-Buоtоmа Nursery, the Lena Pillars Nature Park (Yakutia), that participates in the re-acclimatization program with subsequent release into the wild in their new habitats. The breeding stock was brought from the Canadian Elk Island National Park (Alberta). During the study, six endoparasite species were found, including 1 species of the protozoa, Eimeria bovis, 2 species of cestodes, Moniezia expansa and Moniezia benedeni, and 3 species of nematodes, Cooperia spp., Ostertagia spp. and Trichostrongylus spp. In the course of parasitological studies, zooanthroponosis of bison was excluded and endoparasites were detected that were common to wild and domestic large ungulates typical both for Yakutia and Canada according to epizootological data. In this regard, a potential exchange of helminths and protozoa was possible between natural biocenoses and agro-biocenoses. The parasites found in the Nature Park are a factor of natural selection, but they must be taken into account in the event of a characteristic clinical picture, and in case of loss of livestock, especially young animals, to implement effective therapeutic and preventive measures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".