Forecasting Health Sector Stock Prices using ARIMAX Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In daily stock trading activities, stock prices can experience ups and downs. The rise and fall of stock prices occurs due to changes in supply and demand for these shares. The COVID-19 pandemic did not have a negative effect, instead it had a positive impact on stock prices in health companies. companies in the health sector experienced a fairly good profit of 10.46% in the fourth quarter of 2021. This fact made investors interested in buying shares in companies in the health sector in the hope of selling them when demand increased, resulting in doubled profits. Stock conditions continue to fluctuate every day, making investors need to pay attention and study the past data of the health sector company that will be selected before deciding to invest. Therefore, it is necessary to forecast stock prices in the health sector for the next several periods as a step in making investment decisions. The health sector companies that will be modeled are PT Kimia Farma (Persero) Tbk and PT Kalbe Farma Tbk. The method used in this study is the ARIMAX model. The test and analysis results show that based on the RMSE and MAPE values, the best model is ARIMAX(5,13) for PT Kalbe Farma Tbk shares with a MAPE value of 1% in in-sample data and 0.6% in out-sample data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".