MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Age of Information-Limited Capacity of Uncoordinated Massive Access Using Massive MIMO

2022· article· en· W4280610782 on OpenAlexafffund
Bamelak Tadele, Volodymyr Shyianov, Faouzi Bellili, Amine Mezghani, Ekram Hossain

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTelecommunications linkNetwork packetBase stationLimitingRandom accessUpper and lower boundsChannel state informationComputer networkComputer scienceMIMOTransmission (telecommunications)Performance metricTopology (electrical circuits)Metric (unit)Limit (mathematics)Stochastic geometryChannel (broadcasting)MathematicsWirelessTelecommunicationsStatisticsCombinatoricsEngineeringMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive an achievability bound in an uplink setting where N single-antenna devices, of which a random subset of Kausers are active in each transmission period, attempt to update a base-station (BS), equipped with M antennas, with their status packets. Motivated by emerging applications of massive connectivity we consider the asymptotic scenario where both the total number of users and the number of antennas at the BS grow large at a fixed ratio $\zeta = \frac{M}{N}$. Under maximal-ratio combining and perfect channel state information at the receiver, we find that the achievable rate approaches ${\log _2}\left( {1 + \frac{M}{{{K_a}}}} \right)$ in the large system limit. We explore the trade-offs between this achievable rate and the freshness of the status packets using the age of information (AoI) metric. In the limiting regime, we find that the penalty one pays for increasing the data rate is a rise in the minimum AoI obtainable. Finally, we compare recent massive unsourced random access (URA) schemes against the newly established bound.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC)Same topicAge of Information OptimizationFrench-language works237,207