Occurrences of Pd–Pt Bismuthotellurides and a Phosphohedyphane-Like Phase in Sulfide Veins of the Monchepluton Layered Complex, Kola Peninsula, Russia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe occurrences of platinum-group minerals (PGM) and an uncommon mineral enriched in Cl, and provide a brief review of Cl-bearing minerals associated with basic–ultrabasic complexes. An unusual phosphohedyphane-like phase (~30 µm), close to CaPb4(PO4)3Cl, occurs in one of the PGM-bearing veins of massive sulfides in the Monchepluton layered complex, Kola Peninsula, Russia. These veins consist of varying amounts of pyrrhotite, pentlandite, chalcopyrite, pyrite and accessory grains of galena; they are fairly abundant in the heavy-mineral concentrate, as are small (<0.1 mm) grains of PGM: michenerite, sperrylite, Bi-enriched members of the merenskyite–moncheite series and kotulskite, also rich in Bi. The PGE mineralization is attributed to a low-temperature deposition at the hydrothermal stage. The pyromorphite–phosphohedyphane solid solution likely formed as a secondary phase under conditions of a progressive build-up of oxygen fugacity via oxidation reactions of a precursor grain of galena and involving Ca, as an incompatible component of the sulfides, in a medium of residual fluid enriched in Cl.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".