LAWS: Local Alignment for Water Sites — tracking ordered water in simulations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Protein solvation plays a crucial role in protein function; accurate modeling of protein-water interactions is important for understanding the molecular basis of protein function. In addition to protein structure, x-ray crystallography provides positions of crystallographic water sites (CWS) coordinated by the protein, which can serve as a strong benchmark for modeling accuracy. Such comparison requires special method-ological considerations that take into account the dynamic nature of proteins. However, existing methods for analyzing CWS in MD simulations rely on global alignment of the protein onto the crystal structure, which introduces substantial errors in the case of significant structural deviations. Here, we propose a method called local alignment for water sites (LAWS), which is based on multilateration — an algorithm widely used in GPS tracking. LAWS considers the contacts formed by CWS and protein atoms in the crystal structure and uses these interaction distances to track the CWS in a simulation. LAWS provides a framework to quantify how perturbations of the local protein environment affect the preservation of crystallographic waters in simulations. We applied our method to a 1 µ s simulation of a protein crystal and demonstrate that 76% of CWS are preserved. Compared to existing methods, LAWS identifies more high-confidence (low B-factor) CWS, which are characterized by more prominent water density peaks and a less-perturbed protein environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".