MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280625908 · doi:10.18280/ria.360211

Speech Emotion Recognition Using Machine Learning Techniques

2022· article· en· W4280625908 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMel-frequency cepstrumSpeech recognitionArtificial intelligenceSupport vector machineSubspace topologyPattern recognition (psychology)Classifier (UML)Random subspace methodFeature extractionRandom forestSurpriseDisgustMachine learningPsychologyCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC) method is a feature extraction technique used for speech signals. In machine learning systems, the Random Subspace Method (RSM) known as attribute bagging or bagged featuring used to classify the complete feature sets. In this paper, an innovative method is proposed which is a combination of RSM and kNN algorithm known as Subspace-kNN (S-kNN) classifier. The classifier selects the specific features extracted from MFCC are angry, sad, fear, disgust, calm, happiness, surprise, and neutral speech emotions in Speech Emotion Recognition (SER) system. Furthermore, in the proposed method the performance metrics of accuracy, Positive Predictive Values (PPV) rate, training time are evaluated on male and female voice signals when compared with previous classifiers like SVM and bagged trees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it