MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280631640 · doi:10.24275/uami.1z40kt05n

Especialización tecnológica en la industria automotriz: México, Estados Unidos y Canadá, 1994-2015

2020· dissertation· es· W4280631640 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karla Yareth Torres Busqueño

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive industryChassisIndex (typography)DynamismEngineeringEconomyGeographyCartographyBusinessHumanitiesWelfare economicsIndustrial organizationEconomicsMechanical engineeringComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this master thesis first, is to estimate the revealed technological advantages -RTA-index for 29 technological patent sub-classes of the automotive and auto parts industry, granted by USPTO to Mexico, United States and Canada from 1994 to 2015. Second, to identify which factors are associated to the RTA index. This research takes into account the technological specialization and sectoral innovation systems approaches. We confirm the United States leadership, with high technological intensity sub-classes (electrical and computerized and artificial intelligence systems). Canada specializes in low (refrigeration, and bodywork, chassis systems) and high technological intensity sub-classes (electrical and motor systems). Mexico shares RTA with Canada and the United States in low (bodywork, chassis and comfort, suspension and wheels, tires and brakes) and high technological intensity classes (artificial intelligence and electric systems).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207