MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280632112 · doi:10.14624/nr2202008

Wie wirken sich Beeinträchtigungen der sozialen Kognition auf die narrative Diskursproduktion von Menschen mit Schädel-Hirn-Trauma aus?

2022· article· de· W4280632112 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. Buttner-Kunert

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurologie & Rehabilitation · 2022
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyPsychologyArtHumanitiesMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund: Die Folgen eines Schädel-Hirn-Traumas (SHT) sind vielfältig und können auch kognitive und kommunikative Fähigkeiten beeinträchtigen. Der Einfluss der sozialen Kognition auf diskursive Fähigkeiten wird derzeit kontrovers diskutiert. Methode: Personen mit SHT (PmSHT) wurden im Rahmen einer größeren prospektiven Kohortenstudie rekrutiert. Die Forschungsfragen waren: – Unterscheiden sich PmSHT von neurologischen Gesunden bezüglich der narrativen Fähigkeiten? – Liegen bei PmSHT Störungen der sozialen Kognition vor? – Gibt es einen Zusammenhang zwischen verminderten sozio-kognitiven Fähigkeiten und der narrativen Diskursproduktion? Zur Untersuchung der basalen sozialen Kognition wurde der Untertest Affektdiskriminierung der Tübinger Affekt Batterie eingesetzt. Für die Erhebung der Theory of Mind wurde der Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) verwendet. Für die narrative Diskursproduktion wurde der Untertest »Textproduktion« aus dem MAKRO-Screening durchgeführt. Das allgemeine kognitive Leistungsniveau wurde mit dem MoCA erfasst. Ergebnisse: Bislang wurden 44 Datensätze von 22 PmSHT (4 w/18 m, 38,5 Jahre [SD = 7,9]) und 22 gematchten Kontrollen ausgewertet. PmSHT zeigten in allen durchgeführten Tests außer dem Test zur Affektdiskriminierung schlechtere Ergebnisse als die KG. Für die PmSHT zeigten sich signifikante mittelgradige Korrelationen zwischen dem RMET und dem Untertest Narrative Textproduktion. Diskussion: Die Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass PmSHT Defizite in der ToM aufweisen können und dass sich diese Beeinträchtigungen negativ auf die narrativen Fähigkeiten auswirken. Die interdisziplinäre Diagnostik von Diskursstörungen ist für die Rehabilitation von Menschen mit SHT von hoher Relevanz, da Beeinträchtigung sozio-kommunikativer Fähigkeiten zu dauerhaften Einschränkungen in der Partizipation von Menschen mit SHT führen können. Schlüsselwörter: Schädel-Hirn-Trauma, Erzählfähigkeit, Kommunikation, soziale Kognition, MAKRO Screening Abstract Background: The consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI) are manifold and may also affect cognitive and communicative abilities. The influence of social cognition on discourse abilities is currently controversial. Methods: Individuals with TBI were recruited as part of a larger prospective cohort study. The research questions were: – Do people with TBI differ from neurologically healthy individuals with respect to narrative skills? – Do people with TBI display social cognition disorders? – Is there a relationship between diminished socio-cognitive abilities and narrative discourse production? The affect discrimination subtest of the Tübingen Affect Battery was used to examine basal social cognition. For eliciting Theory of Mind (ToM), the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) was used. For narrative discourse production, the Narrative Text Production subtest from the MAKRO screening was administered. General cognitive performance level was assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Results: To date, 44 datasets from 22 people with TBI (4 w/18 m, 38.5 years [SD = 7.9]) and 22 matched controls have been analyzed. People with TBI showed worse results than the control group in all the tests performed, with the exception of the affect discrimination test. For people with TBI, significant moderate-level correlations were found between the RMET and the Narrative Text Production subtest. Discussion: The results suggest that people with TBI may show deficits in ToM and that these impairments negatively affect narrative skills. The interdisciplinary diagnosis of discourse disorders is highly relevant for the rehabilitation of people with TBI, as impaired socio-communicative skills can lead to permanent limitations on participation of people with TBI. Keywords: traumatic brain injury, narrative skills, communication, social cognition, MAKRO screening

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologie & RehabilitationSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207