MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280632309 · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac9ab1

The Robotic Multiobject Focal Plane System of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI)

2022· article· en· W4280632309 on OpenAlexaff
J. Silber, Parker Fagrelius, Kevin Fanning, M. Schubnell, J. Aguilar, S. P. Ahlen, Jon Ameel, O. Ballester, C. Baltay, C. Bebek, D. Beard, Robert Besuner, L. Cardiel, R. Casas, F. J. Castander, T. Claybaugh, C. A. Dobson, Yutong Duan, Psm Dunlop, Jerry Edelstein, W. Emmet, Ann Elliott, Matthew Evatt, Irena Gershkovich, J. Guy, Stu Harris, Henry Heetderks, Ian Heetderks, K. Honscheid, J. M. Illa, Patrick Jelinsky, Sharon R. Jelinsky, Jorge Jiménez, Armin Karcher, S. Kent, D. Kirkby, Jean‐Paul Kneib, Andrew Lambert, M. Lampton, Daniela Leitner, M. E. Levi, Jeremy McCauley, Aaron Meisner, Timothy N. Miller, R. Miquel, Juliá Mundet, Claire Poppett, D. Rabinowitz, K. Reil, David Roman, David J. Schlegel, S. Serrano, William Van Shourt, David Sprayberry, G. Tarlé, Suk Sien Tie, Curtis Weaverdyck, Kai Zhang, M. Azzaro, S. Bailey, S. Becerril, Tami Blackwell, Mohamed Bouri, D. Brooks, E. Buckley‐Geer, José Peñate Castro, Mark Derwent, Arjun Dey, G. Dhungana, P. Doel, Daniel J. Eisenstein, Nasib Fahim, J. García-Bellido, E. Gaztañaga, Satya Gontcho A Gontcho, G. Gutiérrez, Philipp Hörler, R. Kehoe, Theodore Kisner, Luzius Kronig, Martin Landriau, L. Le Guillou, Paul Martini, John Moustakas, N. Palanque‐Delabrouille, Xiyan Peng, Will J. Percival, Francisco Prada, Carlos Allende Prieto, Guillermo Glez-de-Rivera, E. Sánchez, Justo Sánchez, R. M. Sharples, M. Soares-Santos, Edward F. Schlafly, Benjamin A. Weaver, Zhimin Zhou, Yaling Zhu, Hu Zou

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersHigh Energy PhysicsScience and Technology Facilities CouncilOffice of ScienceCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesDivision of Astronomical SciencesInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesGeneralitat de CatalunyaMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónNational Science FoundationCentro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico IndustrialEuropean Regional Development FundU.S. Department of EnergyEuropean CommissionCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaGordon and Betty Moore FoundationConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsPhysicsCardinal pointTelescopeDark energyObservatorySkyFiducial markerGalaxyLAMOSTFiberMeasure (data warehouse)OpticsOptical fiberAstronomyArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceCosmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A system of 5020 robotic fiber positioners was installed in 2019 on the Mayall Telescope, at Kitt Peak National Observatory. The robots automatically retarget their optical fibers every 10–20 minutes, each to a precision of several microns, with a reconfiguration time of fewer than 2 minutes. Over the next 5 yr, they will enable the newly constructed Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) to measure the spectra of 35 million galaxies and quasars. DESI will produce the largest 3D map of the universe to date and measure the expansion history of the cosmos. In addition to the 5020 robotic positioners and optical fibers, DESI’s Focal Plane System includes six guide cameras, four wave front cameras, 123 fiducial point sources, and a metrology camera mounted at the primary mirror. The system also includes associated structural, thermal, and electrical systems. In all, it contains over 675,000 individual parts. We discuss the design, construction, quality control, and integration of all these components. We include a summary of the key requirements, the review and acceptance process, on-sky validations of requirements, and lessons learned for future multiobject, fiber-fed spectrographs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations180
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207