A Two-Stage Rough Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Application in Three-Level Supply Chain Performance Evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The measure of efficiency for the supply chain is necessary to show productivity and how it uses its resources. One of the most important efficiency measurements is Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The traditional DEA model treats the decision-making units (DMUs) as a black box. It considers only the initial inputs and the final outputs. But the internal interactions between subsystems are neglected. This type of DEA is used for straightforward systems, but the complex multistage systems like supply chains, traditional DEA get inaccurate efficiency indicators. As well as, one of the main challenges is the uncertainty of data. The inputs and outputs values are usually required to be deterministic in traditional DEA. Although, this is not a case of real-life problems. Therefore, we develop a mixed innovative approach from Two-stage DEA and rough set theory to produce a modified Two-stage RDEA. The proposed model can measure the efficiency of DMUs comprehensively by considering the internal structure of any supply chain and treating with incomplete and imprecise data. We applied the Two-stage RDEA model in a three-level supply chain to show its applicability to measure the efficiency for both a whole supply chain and all levels comprehensively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".