Identification of an unusual cluster of human granulocytic anaplasmosis in the Estrie region, Québec, Canada in 2021
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: ) of the genus Rickettsia. Here, we describe the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of an unusual cluster of HGA cases detected in the Estrie region in Québec, Canada, during the 2021 transmission season. Methods: Confirmed cases of HGA were defined as individuals with typical clinical manifestations and a positive polymerase chain reaction assay. The cases were interviewed using a structured questionnaire and clinical data was obtained from medical records. Results: A total of 25 confirmed cases were identified during the 2021 transmission season, thus constituting the largest known cluster of HGA in Canada. The most common symptoms reported were fever, fatigue and headaches. Laboratory investigations found that 20 (80%) of the patients had thrombocytopenia and 18 (72%) had leukopenia at presentation. Almost half of the patients required hospitalization (n=11, 44%), with a median duration of four days (interquartile range [IQR] 2.5-5 days), including one patient who required intensive care. No deaths were recorded during the study. Epidemiological investigation found that all cases were domestically acquired, and yard maintenance was the most prevalent at-risk activity identified. Only seven (28%) cases had been aware of a tick bite in the previous two weeks. Conclusion: may now be established along the southern border of Québec. Clinicians should consider HGA when assessing patients with typical symptoms and recent exposure to high-risk environments for tick bite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".