MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280650648 · doi:10.18280/jesa.550215

Joint Scheduling of Charging and Service Operation of Electric Taxi Based on Reinforcement Learning

2022· article· en· W4280650648 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chen Zhu, Fuchun Jiang, Yuliang Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersXiamen UniversityXiamen University of Technology
KeywordsTaxisScheduling (production processes)Reinforcement learningComputer scienceCharging stationElectricityGridComputer networkReal-time computingElectric vehicleAutomotive engineeringTransport engineeringEngineeringPower (physics)Electrical engineeringOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the high daily power consumption, electric taxis require frequently recharging. Affected by the step tariff and shifting of duty, congestion often occurs during peak hours at charging stations, which seriously affects the normal operation of the traffic and electricity grid. This paper proposes a joint management architecture that integrates the service operation of e-taxis and charging networks. Aiming at minimizing drivers' charging overhead, a scheduling scheme that combines taxi service operation scheduling with charging planning is designed based on reinforcement learning method. The low battery e-taxi is arranged to pick up the passenger whose destination is close to an appropriate charging station. Simulation results show that the proposed scheme can effectively reduce drivers' charging overhead by shortening deadhead kilometers and waiting time at charging station.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207