MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280650707 · doi:10.54143/jbmede.v2i1.69

Diretrizes Brasileiras para o tratamento farmacológico de pacientes hospitalizados com COVID-19

2022· article· en· W4280650707 on OpenAlexaff
Maicon Falavigna, Cinara Stein, José Luis Gomes do Amaral, Luciano César Pontes Azevedo, Karlyse Claudino Belli, Verônica Colpani, Clóvis Arns da Cunha, Felipe Dal‐Pizzol, Maria Beatriz Souza Dias, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Ana Paula Da Rocha Freitas, Débora Dalmas Gräf, Hélio Penna Guimarães, Suzana Margareth Lobo, José Tadeu Colares Monteiro, Michelle Silva Nunes, Maura Salaroli de Oliveira, Clementina Corah Lucas Prado, Vânia Cristina Canuto Santos, Rosemeri Maurici da Silva, Marcone Lima Sobreira, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Ávila Teixeira Vidal, Ricardo Machado Xavier, Alexandre Prehn Zavascki, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de Carvalho

Bibliographic record

VenueJBMEDE - Jornal Brasileiro de Medicina de Emergência · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLopinavirGuidelineHydroxychloroquineIntensive care medicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)RitonavirHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Internal medicineFamily medicineViral load

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Several therapies are being used or proposed for COVID-19, and many lack appropriate evaluations of their effectiveness and safety. The purpose of this document is to develop recommendations to support decisions regarding the pharmacological treatment of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Brazil. Methods: A group of 27 experts, including representatives of the Ministry of Health and methodologists, created this guideline. The method used for the rapid development of guidelines was based on the adoption and/or adaptation of existing international guidelines (GRADE ADOLOPMENT) and supported by the e-COVID-19 RecMap platform. The quality of the evidence and the preparation of the recommendations followed the GRADE method. Results: Sixteen recommendations were generated. They include strong recommendations for the use of corticosteroids in patients using supplemental oxygen, the use of anticoagulants at prophylactic doses to prevent thromboembolism and the nonuse of antibiotics in patients without suspected bacterial infection. It was not possible to make a recommendation regarding the use of tocilizumab in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 using oxygen due to uncertainties regarding the availability of and access to the drug. Strong recommendations against the use of hydroxychloroquine, convalescent plasma, colchicine, lopinavir + ritonavir and antibiotics in patients without suspected bacterial infection and also conditional recommendations against the use of casirivimab + imdevimab, ivermectin and rendesivir were made. Conclusion: To date, few therapies have proven effective in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, and only corticosteroids and prophylaxis for thromboembolism are recommended. Several drugs were considered ineffective and should not be used to provide the best treatment according to the principles of evidence-based medicine and promote economical resource use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJBMEDE - Jornal Brasileiro de Medicina de EmergênciaSame topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207