MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281250962 · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100370

Rhythmicity of sleep and clinical outcomes in major depressive disorder: A CAN-BIND-1 report

2022· article· en· W4281250962 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Affective Disorders Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsKrembil FoundationMcMaster UniversityQueen's UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersJanssen PharmaceuticalsTakeda CanadaH. Lundbeck A/SMitacsServierLundbeckfondenOtsuka AmericaGovernment of OntarioOntario Mental Health FoundationAllerganCanadian Network for Mood and Anxiety TreatmentsU.S. Department of DefenseCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSunovionFlinn FoundationFaculty of Science, Agriculture and Engineering, Newcastle UniversityOntario Brain InstituteMinistry of Health -SingaporePfizer
KeywordsMajor depressive disorderDepression (economics)Logistic regressionEscitalopramRating scaleInternal medicinePsychologyHamilton Rating Scale for DepressionPsychiatryMedicineAnxietyCognitionAntidepressantDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although there is substantial research demonstrating the effects of duration and quality of sleep on outcomes in major depressive disorder (MDD), there is little research examining whether rhythmicity of sleep can also affect outcomes in MDD. The objective of our study was to investigate the relationship between rhythmicity of sleep and clinical outcomes in MDD The prospective study (N = 208) included MDD patients treated with escitalopram for 8-weeks. Rhythmicity of sleep was assessed with Biological Rhythms Interview for Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (BRIAN) at baseline and after 8-weeks. Depression was assessed with Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR) throughout 8-weeks. Outcomes were depression severity over 8-weeks and remission of depression after 8-weeks. Mixed effect models (MMRMs) and logistic regression models were conducted Baseline BRIAN sleep score predicted MADRS (Adjusted B = 0.34;95%CI:0.01–0.66,p = 0.04) and QIDS-SR (Adjusted B = 0.19;95%CI:0.02–0.36,p = 0.03) scores over time in MMRMs. BRIAN falling asleep (Adjusted B = 0.44;95%CI:0.01–0.86,p = 0.04) and switching off (Adjusted B = 0.50;95%CI:0.03–0.97,p = 0.04) items predicted QIDS-SR scores over time. BRIAN sleep score predicted remission with MADRS (Adjusted OR:0.87;95%CI:0.76–0.99) and QIDS-SR (Adjusted OR:0.76;95%CI:0.64–0.90) in logistic regression models. BRIAN falling asleep item predicted remission with MADRS (Adjusted OR:0.71;95%CI:0.64–0.90) and QIDS-SR (Adjusted OR:0.62;95%CI:0.42–0.92). BRIAN switching off item predicted remission with QIDS-SR (Adjusted OR:0.62;95%CI:0.40–0.96) Did not examine for circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders or social conditions that causes circadian disturbances (e.g., shiftwork) A disturbed rhythmicity of sleep, particularly in the ability to switch off when resting and falling asleep, may increase the risk of poor clinical outcomes in MDD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it