1832 : le choléra en prison, peur de l’invasion, stratégies de lutte et bilan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les sources de l’administration centrale aux Archives nationales (F/16) permettent de retracer les différents moyens mis en œuvre à l’échelon local et national pour prévenir l’invasion du choléra dans les prisons en 1832. Les nombreux échanges, en amont et en aval de l’épidémie, entre les directeurs de prisons, les préfets, le ministre et les commissions sanitaires illustrent l’attention particulière apportée à l’hygiène et à l’assainissement des prisons départementales, des maisons centrales et des chaînes des bagnes considérées comme des foyers de contagion de l’épidémie. Le nombre de détenus atteints du choléra et les chiffres de leur mortalité semblent contredire cette peur, notamment à Paris, pourtant épicentre de l’épidémie et dont les prisons connurent un afflux de détenus en raison des tensions politiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".