MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dephosphorylation Targeting Chimaera (DEPTAC): Targeting Tau Proteinsin Tauopathies

2022· article· en· W4281263045 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Soumbasis, Mohamed A. Eldeeb, Mohamed A. Ragheb, Cornelia E. Zorca

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Protein and Peptide Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurodegenerationDephosphorylationTau proteinCell biologyTauopathyNeurosciencePhosphorylationChimera (genetics)ChemistryBiologyPhosphataseBiochemistryAlzheimer's diseaseMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One salient hallmark of neurodegeneration is the accumulation of toxic protein aggregates in neuronal cells. This proteotoxicity culminates in the deterioration of neuronal function. In AD and related tauopathies, the microtubule-associated protein tau becomes hyperphosphorylated. Hyperphosphorylated tau forms neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) within neurons, which constitute a unique feature of tauopathies, including AD. A recent study has exploited a novel molecular strategy to counteract hyperphosphorylated tau and enhance its degradation. Analogous to the PROTAC methodology, a novel dephosphorylation targeting chimera (DEPTAC) was designed to promote the molecular interaction between tau and phosphatase, which, in turn, augments its degradation. Herein, we briefly discuss this novel finding and its potential therapeutic implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Protein and Peptide ScienceSame topicProtein Degradation and InhibitorsFrench-language works237,207