Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Materi Sifat-Sifat Cahaya Siswa
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research examines the Applying Of Cooperative Learning Model Type Of Group Investigation To Increase Students Achievement Topic The Nature Of Light Grade IV UPTD SD Negeri 58 Parepare. The problem of this research are 1) How can the applying of cooperative learning model type of group investigation can increase student process topic the nature of light grade IV UPTD SD Negeri 58 Parepare? 2) Can the applying of cooperative learning model type of group investigation to increase achievement students topic the nature of light grade IV UPTD SD Negeri 58 Parepare?. The type of research used is Classroom Action Research (CAR) and the approach used is a qualitative approach. The stages of classroom action research consist of 4 stages, namely planning, implementation, observation and reflection. The subjects in this research were fourth grade students of UPTD SD Negeri 58 Parepare for the academic year 2021/2022, totaling 16 students, as well as a teacher. Based on the data obtained during the implementation of the first cycle and second cycle, the results of the research for the first cycle of student learning outcomes with a completeness percentage of 73.43% were in the sufficient category (C). Meanwhile, for the second cycle, the percentage of completeness was 83.37% which was in the good category (B). From this research, it can be concluded that the process and student achievement Topic The Nature Of Light Grade IV UPTD SD Negeri 58 Parepare by applying the group investigation type cooperative learning model has increased.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it