MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4281287618 · doi:10.1101/2022.05.05.22274031

Genomic architecture of Autism Spectrum Disorder from comprehensive whole-genome sequence annotation

2022· preprint· en· W4281287618 on OpenAlexafffund
Brett Trost, Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram, Ada J. S. Chan, Worrawat Engchuan, Edward J. Higginbotham, Jennifer Howe, Lívia O. Loureiro, Miriam S. Reuter, Delnaz Roshandel, J. Andrew Whitney, Mehdi Zarrei, Matthew Bookman, Cherith Somerville, Rulan Shaath, Mona Abdi, Elbay Aliyev, Rohan Patel, Thomas Nalpathamkalam, Giovanna Pellecchia, Omar Hamdan, Gaganjot Kaur, Zhuozhi Wang, Jeffrey R. MacDonald, John Wei, Wilson W. L. Sung, Sylvia Lamoureux, Ny Hoang, Thanuja Selvanayagam, Nicole Deflaux, Melissa Geng, Siavash Ghaffari, John Bates, Edwin J. Young, Qiliang Ding, Carole Shum, Lia D’Abate, Clarissa A. Bradley, Annabel Rutherford, Vernie Aguda, Beverly Apresto, Nan Chen, Sachin Desai, Xiaoyan Du, Matthew L.Y. Fong, Sanjeev Pullenayegum, Kozue Samler, Ting Wang, Karen J. Ho, Tara Paton, Sérgio L. Pereira, Jo-Anne Herbrick, Richard F. Wintle, Jonathan Fuerth, Juti Noppornpitak, Heather Ward, Patrick Magee, Ayman Al Baz, Usanthan Kajendirarajah, Sharvari Kapadia, Jim Vlasblom, Monica Valluri, Joseph Green, Vicki Seifer, Morgan Quirbach, Olivia Rennie, Elizabeth Kelley, Nina Masjedi, Catherine Lord, Michael J. Szego, Ma’n H. Zawati, Michael Lang, Lisa J. Strug, Christian R. Marshall, Gregory Costain, Kristina Calli, Alana Iaboni, Afiqah Yusuf, Patricia Ambrozewicz, Louise Gallagher, David G. Amaral, Jessica Brian, Mayada Elsabbagh, Stelios Georgiades, Daniel S. Messinger, Sally Ozonoff, Jonathan Sebat, Calvin Sjaarda, Isabel M. Smith, Péter Szatmári, Lonnie Zwaigenbaum, Azadeh Kushki, Thomas Frazier, Jacob Vorstman, Khalid A. Fakhro, Bridget A. Fernandez, M. E. Suzanne Lewis, Rosanna Weksberg, Marc Fiume, Ryan K. C. Yuen, Evdokia Anagnostou, Neal Sondheimer, David Glazer, Dean M. Hartley, Stephen W. Scherer

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie UniversityMcMaster UniversityBC Children's HospitalHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoQueen's UniversityMcGill UniversityPublic Health OntarioTed Rogers Centre for Heart ResearchUniversity of British ColumbiaHospital for Sick Children
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchQatar National Research FundKids Brain Health NetworkHospital for Sick ChildrenGenome British ColumbiaBC Children's HospitalCanadian Open Neuroscience PlatformChildren's Hospital FoundationNational Institutes of HealthOntario GenomicsStollery Children’s Hospital FoundationFonds National de la Recherche LuxembourgFondation Brain CanadaGenome CanadaSimons FoundationSimons Foundation Autism Research InitiativeGovernment of OntarioUniversity of TorontoAutism Speaks
KeywordsAutism spectrum disorderGeneticsAutismWhole genome sequencingExome sequencingGenetic architectureBiologyComputational biologyGenomeGeneGenomicsCopy-number variationMutationPhenotypeMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fully understanding the genetic factors involved in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) requires whole-genome sequencing (WGS), which theoretically allows the detection of all types of genetic variants. With the aim of generating an unprecedented resource for resolving the genomic architecture underlying ASD, we analyzed genome sequences and phenotypic data from 5,100 individuals with ASD and 6,212 additional parents and siblings (total n=11,312) in the Autism Speaks MSSNG Project, as well as additional individuals from other WGS cohorts. WGS data and autism phenotyping were based on high-quality short-read sequencing (>30x coverage) and clinically accepted diagnostic measures for ASD, respectively. For initial discovery of ASD-associated genes, we used exonic sequence-level variants from MSSNG as well as whole-exome sequencing-based ASD data from SPARK and the Autism Sequencing Consortium (>18,000 trios plus additional cases and controls), identifying 135 ASD-associated protein-coding genes with false discovery rate <10%. Combined with ASD-associated genes curated from the literature, this list was used to guide the interpretation of all other variant types in WGS data from MSSNG and the Simons Simplex Collection (SSC; n=9,205). We identified ASD-associated rare variants in 789/5,100 individuals with ASD from MSSNG (15%) and 421/2,419 from SSC (17%). Considering the genomic architecture, 57% of ASD-associated rare variants were nuclear sequence-level variants, 41% were nuclear structural variants (SVs) (mainly copy number variants, but also including inversions, large insertions, uniparental isodisomies, and tandem repeat expansions), and 2% were mitochondrial variants. Several of the ASD-associated SVs would have been difficult to detect without WGS, including an inversion disrupting SCN2A and a nuclear mitochondrial insertion impacting SYNGAP1 . Polygenic risk scores did not differ between children with ASD in multiplex families versus simplex, and rare, damaging recessive events were significantly depleted in multiplex families, collectively suggesting that rare, dominant variation plays a predominant role in multiplex ASD. Our study provides a guidebook for exploring genotype-phenotype correlations in the 15-20% of ASD families who carry ASD-associated rare variants, as well as an entry point to the larger and more diverse studies that will be required to dissect the etiology in the >80% of the ASD population that remains idiopathic. All data resulting from this study are available to the medical genomics research community in an open but protected manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research→French-language works237,207→