Succinct <i>k</i> -mer Sets Using Subset Rank Queries on the Spectral Burrows-Wheeler Transform <sup>*</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The k -spectrum of a string is the set of all distinct substrings of length k occurring in the string. This is a lossy but computationally convenient representation of the information in the string, with many applications in high-throughput bioinformatics. In this work, we define the notion of the Spectral Burrows-Wheeler Transform (SBWT), which is a sequence of subsets of the alphabet of the string encoding the k -spectrum of the string. The SBWT is a distillation of the ideas found in the BOSS and Wheeler graph data structures. We explore multiple different approaches to index the SBWT for membership queries on the underlying k -spectrum. We identify subset rank queries as the essential subproblem, and propose four succinct index structures to solve it. One of the approaches essentially leads to the known BOSS data structure, while the other three offer attractive time-space trade-offs and support simpler query algorithms that rely only on fast rank queries. The most general approach involves a novel data structure we call the subset wavelet tree , which we find to be of independent interest. All of the approaches are also amendable to entropy compression, which leads to good space bounds on the sizes of the data structures. Using entropy compression, we show that the SBWT can support membership queries on the k -spectrum of a single string in O ( k ) time and ( n + k )(log σ + 1 / ln 2) + o (( n + k ) σ ) bits of space, where n is the number of distinct substrings of length k in the input and σ is the size of the alphabet. This improves from the time O ( k log σ ) achieved by the BOSS data structure. We show, via experiments on a range of genomic data sets, that the simplicity of our new indexes translates into large performance gains in practice over prior art.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".