The Development of Frequency Multipliers for Terahertz Remote Sensing System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper summarizes the development of novel Schottky-diode-based terahertz frequency multipliers. The basic structure and manufacturing process of planar Schottky barrier diodes (SBDs) are reviewed, along with other diode structures that have been proposed in the literature. A numerical modeling method for the novel diodes in the context of terahertz frequency multipliers is presented, which includes 3D electromagnetic (EM) modeling, electro-thermal modeling and modeling of physical non-ideal effects. Furthermore, a general design methodology for developing terahertz frequency multipliers is introduced, involving a sub-division design method (SDM), a global design method (GDM) and a half-sub-division and half-global design method (HS-HGDM). These methods are summarized and compared for 110 GHz and 220 GHz frequency multipliers in the context of communication and imaging applications. Laboratory measurements of these multipliers show good agreement with numerical simulations. Finally, several classic terahertz remote sensing systems are reviewed, and a 220 GHz remote sensing system established using novel frequency multipliers for security inspection purposes is presented along with associated imaging results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".