Psychiatric comorbidity in a sample of Egyptian women with vaginismus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Vaginismus is a female sexual dysfunction affecting the quality of women and the couple’s relationship. It is considered the main feminine cause of unconsummated marriage in Egypt. The study aims in assessment of comorbid psychiatric disorders, personality disorders, and levels of alexithymia among a sample of women with vaginismus. It is a case-control study where 30 women diagnosed with vaginismus following up in the psychosexual clinic in Ain Shams University Hospitals were enrolled in the study in comparison to 30 controls. Assessment was done based on the socio-demographic data, Toronto Alexithymia scale (TAS-20), Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders (SCID-I), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Disorders (SCID-II). Results It was found that women having vaginismus had significant below university level of education ( P = 0.026) together with their partners ( P = 0.006). It was also found that women having vaginismus are showing high levels of alexithymia ( p < 0.001), more than one anxiety and/or depressive disorder ( P = 0.032) in comparison to the control group. Also, borderline personality disorder/traits and avoidant personality traits were significantly more frequent among cases ( P = 0.026, P = 0.001, and P = 0.045 respectively). Moreover, it was found that having two or more of either of rigidity, perfectionism, dramatization, mood swings, and impulsivity was significantly more frequent among cases ( P < 0.001) showing a unique personality pattern of women with vaginismus. Conclusions Women with vaginismus were having higher levels of alexithymia, more developing anxiety, and depressive disorders than controls and they have specific personality characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".