<scp>AI</scp> models for correlation of physical properties in system of <scp>1DMA2P‐CO<sub>2</sub>‐H<sub>2</sub>O</scp>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this work, the density, viscosity, and specific heat capacity of pure 1‐dimethylamino‐2‐propanol (1DMA2P) as well as aqueous unloaded and CO 2 ‐loaded 1DMA2P solution (with a CO 2 loading of 0.04–0.70 mol CO 2 /mol amine) were measured over the 1DMA2P concentration range of 0.5–3.0 mol/L and temperature range of 293–323 K. The observed experimental results of these thermophysical properties of the 1DMA2P‐H 2 O‐CO 2 system were correlated using empirical models as well as artificial neural network (ANN) models (namely, back‐propagation neural network [BPNN] and radial basis function neural network [RBFNN] models). It was found that the developed BPNN and RBFNN models could predict the experimental results of 1DMA2P‐H 2 O‐CO 2 better than correlations using empirical models. The results could be treated as one of the accurate and potential methods to predict the physical properties for aqueous amine CO 2 absorption systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it