Project SWAVE 2.0: An overview of the study design for multimodal placental image acquisition and alignment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Development of non-invasive and in utero placenta imaging techniques can potentially identify biomarkers of placental health. Correlative imaging using multiple multiscale modalities is particularly important to advance the understanding of placenta structure, function and their relationship. The objective of the project SWAVE 2.0 was to understand human placental structure and function and thereby identify quantifiable measures of placental health using a multimodal correlative approach. In this paper, we present a multimodal image acquisition protocol designed to acquire and align data from ex vivo placenta specimens derived from both healthy and complicated pregnancies. Qualitative and quantitative validation of the alignment method were performed. The qualitative analysis showed good correlation between findings in the MRI, ultrasound and histopathology images. The proposed protocol would enable future studies on comprehensive analysis of placental anatomy, function and their relationship. ● An overview of a novel multimodal placental image acquisition protocol is presented. ● A co-registration method using surface markers and external fiducials is described. ● A preliminary correlative imaging analysis for a placenta specimen is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.022 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".