Computational properties of multi-compartment LIF neurons with passive dendrites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Mixed-signal neuromorphic computers often emulate some variant of the LIF neuron model. While, in theory, two-layer networks of these neurons are universal function approximators, single-layer networks consisting of slightly more complex neurons can, at the cost of universality, be more efficient. In this paper, we discuss a family of LIF neurons with passive dendrites. We provide rules that describe how input channels targeting different dendritic compartments interact, and test in how far these interactions can be harnessed in a spiking neural network context. We find that a single layer of two-compartment neurons approximates some functions at smaller errors than similarly sized hidden-layer networks. Single-layer networks with with three compartment neurons can approximate functions such as XOR and four-quadrant multiplication well; adding more compartments only offers small improvements in accuracy. From the perspective of mixed-signal neuromorphic systems, our results suggest that only small modifications to the neuron circuit are necessary to construct more computationally powerful and energy efficient systems that move more computation into the dendritic, analogue domain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".