MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281397796 · doi:10.1101/2022.05.20.491843

Heterologous Expression of NoxA Confers Aerotolerance in <i>Clostridium sporogenes</i>

2022· preprint· en· W4281397796 on OpenAlexaff
Sara Sadr, Bahram Zargar, Justo Sandino, Marc G. Aucoin, Brian Ingalls

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsAmerican Water (Canada)University of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClostridium sporogenesClostridiumMicrobiologyBiologyHeterologousBacteriaClostridium beijerinckiiSporeBiochemistryGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Clostridium is a genus of Gram-positive obligate anaerobic bacteria. Some species of Clostridium , including C. sporogenes , may be of use in bacteria-mediated cancer therapy. Spores of Clostridium are inert in healthy normoxic tissue, but germinate when in the hypoxic regions of solid tumors, causing tumor regression. However, such treatments fail to completely eradicate tumors because of higher oxygen levels rise at the tumor’s outer rim. In this study, we demonstrate that a degree of aerotolerance can be introduced to C. sporogenes by transfer of the noxA gene from C. aminovalericum . NoxA is a water-forming NADH oxidase enzyme. Thus, its activity has no detrimental effect on cell viability. In addition to its potential in cancer treatment, the noxA -expressing strain described here could be used to alleviate challenges related to oxygen sensitivity of C. sporogenes in biomanufacturing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207