0D/2D mixed-dimensional perovskite constructed by thiol- and disulfide-containing ligands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reduced-dimensional (RD) perovskites have shown attractive chemical and physical properties for optoelectronic applications. Incorporating large organic ligands enables infinite tunability in the components and structures. Theoretically, it is feasible to apply multiple types of organic ligands in a single RD crystal to achieve multiple-dimensional perovskites. However, the coexistence of different organic ligands commonly introduces competing crystal growths that inhibit the formation of a more complex crystal structure. Herein, we report a case of mixed-dimensional (MD) perovskite single crystal containing two types of sulfide-containing ligands. We show that the application of ketones can partially oxidize organothiol ligands in the precursor solution. The resultant disulfide-based ligands can be co-incorporated with the thiol-based ligand in a single MD perovskite crystal. X-ray diffraction confirmed that the structure contains both layered and isolated inorganic components constructed by face-sharing lead halide octahedra. Unlike conventional RD structures, the MD perovskite shows an enlarged bandgap with valence band maximum and conduction band minimum being spatially separated, and isotropic optical features, as revealed by x-ray diffraction, spectroscopies, and density functional theory computation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".