MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281478490 · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac882b

Overview of the Instrumentation for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument

2022· article· en· W4281478490 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersBrookhaven National LaboratoryArgonne National LaboratoryHigh Energy PhysicsScience and Technology Facilities CouncilUniversity of California, IrvineOffice of ScienceShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónUniversity of WaterlooKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaUniversity of RochesterYork UniversityDurham UniversityLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryDivision of Astronomical SciencesUniversity of PennsylvaniaÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterGordon and Betty Moore FoundationSwinburne University of TechnologyUniversity of WyomingUniversity of PittsburghUniversity College LondonInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueUniversität ZürichCarnegie Mellon UniversitySLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryHarvard UniversityUniversitat de BarcelonaOhio State UniversitySouthern Methodist UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthAix-Marseille UniversitéU.S. Department of EnergyHeising-Simons FoundationUniversity of TorontoYale UniversityEuropean Space AgencyFermilabNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsDark energyInstrumentation (computer programming)RedshiftTelescopeFirst lightGalaxyOpticsSpectrographAstronomyCosmologySpectral lineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) embarked on an ambitious 5 yr survey in 2021 May to explore the nature of dark energy with spectroscopic measurements of 40 million galaxies and quasars. DESI will determine precise redshifts and employ the baryon acoustic oscillation method to measure distances from the nearby universe to beyond redshift z > 3.5, and employ redshift space distortions to measure the growth of structure and probe potential modifications to general relativity. We describe the significant instrumentation we developed to conduct the DESI survey. This includes: a wide-field, 3.°2 diameter prime-focus corrector; a focal plane system with 5020 fiber positioners on the 0.812 m diameter, aspheric focal surface; 10 continuous, high-efficiency fiber cable bundles that connect the focal plane to the spectrographs; and 10 identical spectrographs. Each spectrograph employs a pair of dichroics to split the light into three channels that together record the light from 360–980 nm with a spectral resolution that ranges from 2000–5000. We describe the science requirements, their connection to the technical requirements, the management of the project, and interfaces between subsystems. DESI was installed at the 4 m Mayall Telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory and has achieved all of its performance goals. Some performance highlights include an rms positioner accuracy of better than 0.″1 and a median signal-to-noise ratio of 7 of the [O ii ] doublet at 8 × 10 −17 erg s −1 cm −2 in 1000 s for galaxies at z = 1.4–1.6. We conclude with additional highlights from the on-sky validation and commissioning, key successes, and lessons learned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it