On Predictive Modeling Using a New Flexible Weibull Distribution and Machine Learning Approach: Analyzing the COVID-19 Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Predicting and modeling time-to-events data is a crucial and interesting research area. For modeling and predicting such types of data, numerous statistical models have been suggested and implemented. This study introduces a new statistical model, namely, a new modified flexible Weibull extension (NMFWE) distribution for modeling the mortality rate of COVID-19 patients. The introduced model is obtained by modifying the flexible Weibull extension model. The maximum likelihood estimators of the NMFWE model are obtained. The evaluation of the estimators of the NMFWE model is assessed in a simulation study. The flexibility and applicability of the NMFWE model are established by taking two datasets representing the mortality rates of COVID-19-infected persons in Mexico and Canada. For predictive modeling, we consider two pure statistical models and two machine learning (ML) algorithms. The pure statistical models include the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) and non-parametric autoregressive moving average (NP-ARMA), and the ML algorithms include neural network autoregression (NNAR) and support vector regression (SVR). To evaluate their forecasting performance, three standard measures of accuracy, namely, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) are calculated. The findings demonstrate that ML algorithms are very effective at predicting the mortality rate data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it