Activation of NLR-Mediated Autoimmunity in Arabidopsis Early in Short Days 4 Mutant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From a reverse genetic screen using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing tool, we unintentionally identified an autoimmune mutant. Map-based cloning and whole-genome sequencing revealed that it contains a deletion in SMALL UBIQUITIN-RELATED MODIFIER (SUMO) protease encoding gene EARLY IN SHORT DAYS 4 (ESD4). Previous studies reported that esd4 mutants accumulate elevated levels of plant defense hormone salicylic acid (SA). However, upregulated PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENE 1 (PR1) expression in esd4 only partly relies on SA level. In this study, we show that plant metabolite N-hydroxypipecolic acid (NHP) biosynthetic genes are upregulated in esd4, and NHP biosynthesis mutant flavin-dependent-monooxygenase 1 (fmo1) partially suppresses the autoimmune phenotypes of esd4, suggestive of a requirement of NHP signaling for the autoimmunity in esd4. As activation of nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat immune receptors (NLRs) are associates with the biosynthesis of SA and NHP and lipase-like protein ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY 1 (EDS1) is a key component downstream of many NLRs, we examined the relationship between EDS1 and ESD4 by analyzing the eds1 esd4 double mutant. We found that eds1 largely suppresses esd4 autoimmunity and blocks the elevated expressions of SA and NHP biosynthesis-related genes in esd4. Overall, our study provides evidence supporting the hypothesis that SUMO protease ESD4 likely targets a yet to be identified guardee of NLR by removing its SUMO modification to avoid recognition by the cognate NLR. Loss of ESD4 results in activation of NLR-mediated autoimmunity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".