MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Efficient Strategy for Distributing the Mesh of Parallel Electromagnetic Solvers Based on the AIM

2022· article· en· W4281484081 on OpenAlexaff
Damian Marek, Shashwat Sharma, Piero Triverio

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 16th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceParallel computingPolygon meshPartition (number theory)Adaptive mesh refinementComputational scienceDistributed computingMathematicsComputer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parallel electromagnetic solvers require efficient strategies to distribute the mesh of large structures encountered in advanced antenna designs. In addition, parallel solvers based on the adaptive integral method (AIM) require processes to access additional mesh entities that lie within the near region of their mesh partition. In this paper, we propose a parallel solution for loading, processing, partitioning, and redistributing the mesh of AIM-based solvers. The proposed method is demonstrated on problems as large as 200 wavelengths, with up to 200 million unknowns, and up to 8000 cores involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 16th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP)Same topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207