MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281486515 · doi:10.3233/shti220404

Characterization of Type 2 Diabetes Using Counterfactuals and Explainable AI

2022· article· en· W4281486515 on OpenAlexaff
Marta Lenatti, Alberto Carlevaro, Karim Keshavjee, Aziz Guergachi, Alessia Paglialonga, Maurizio Mongelli

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in health technology and informatics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityYork UniversityPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
FundersCompagnia di San Paolo
KeywordsMedicineCounterfactual thinkingBody mass indexCounterfactual conditionalType 2 diabetesDiseaseDiabetes mellitusType 2 Diabetes MellitusBlood sugarGerontologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder of glucose management, whose prevalence is increasing inexorably worldwide. Adherence to therapies, along with a healthy lifestyle can help prevent the onset of disease. This preliminary study proposes the use of explainable artificial intelligence techniques with the aim of (i) characterizing diabetic patients through a set of easily interpretable rules and (ii) providing individualized recommendations for the prevention of the onset of the disease through the generation of counterfactual explanations, based on minimal variations of biomarkers routinely collected in primary care. The results of this preliminary study parallel findings from the literature as differences in biomarkers between patients with and without diabetes are observed for fasting blood sugar, body mass index, and high-density lipoprotein levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.164
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in health technology and informaticsSame topicArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207