MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281556563 · doi:10.1017/9781800103788.004

The Politics of White Rule

2022· other· en· W4281556563 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Economic history of UK and US
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsWhite (mutation)Political scienceLawBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prior to the discovery of gold and diamonds in the Boer Republics of the Transvaal and Orange Free State in the late nineteenth century, the territories of the future South Africa were widely regarded as offering only marginal economic prospects for white settlement. The Boers (forebears of today's Afrikaners) were widely considered to be backward and primitive, and although the British colonies of the Cape and Natal offered some opportunity for agricultural and mercantile development, the militant resistance of much larger black populations to white territorial encroachment, involving costly and brutal wars, severely limited their appeal. Perceptions were only to change once it became known that South Africa possessed vast mineral resources, which resulted in a significant influx of settlers from Britain and elsewhere. Even so, South Africa's attractions were never able to compete on equal terms with the other more established British territories of settlement such as Australia, Canada and New Zealand. In no other British settler territory was settlement so fraught. In order to secure free access to the newly discovered mineral resources for its nationals, Britain had launched an enormously expensive and brutal war against the two Boer republics in order to establish imperial hegemony. Confronted by a wily enemy which used unconventional tactics over a vast land, the British forces were to suffer numerous setbacks and humiliations before their superior numbers and resources resulted in the eventual defeat of the Boers. However, Britain's victory in the Anglo-Boer war of 1899–1902 was a hollow one, and left widespread devastation, Boer impoverishment, resultant resentment and massive social dislocation in its wake. Correspondingly, the formation of the Union of South Africa in 1910 out of four former predecessor territories (the British colonies of the Cape and Natal alongside the Transvaal and Orange Free State) represented a major climb-down whereby the British state under a newly installed Liberal government resolved to concede political control to those who had been defeated on the battlefield in exchange for guarantees about the security of British mining, financial and other interests. Union was hailed as an act of far-sighted magnanimity by the British. The imbalance between the ‘Dutch’ and ‘English-speaking’ white populations was such that the former had the potential to dominate politically, were they to unite (the subordination of the indigenous population being assumed).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0170.026
Scholarly communication0.0130.006
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPolitical and Economic history of UK and USFrench-language works237,207