MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281569105 · doi:10.1007/s00167-022-07003-5

MPFL reconstruction results in lower redislocation rates and higher functional outcomes than rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

2022· review· en· W4281569105 on OpenAlex
Dan Cohen, NhatChinh Le, Alexander Zakharia, Benjamin Blackman, Darren de

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKnee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster UniversityMcMaster University Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRehabilitationMeta-analysisMedial patellofemoral ligamentPhysical therapySurgeryOrthopedic surgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose To determine the effect of early MPFL reconstruction versus rehabilitation on the rate of recurrent patellar dislocations and functional outcomes in skeletally mature patients with traumatic, first‐time patellar dislocation. Methods Three online databases MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE were searched from database inception (1946, 1966, and 1974, respectively) to August 20th, 2021 for literature addressing the management of patients sustaining acute first‐time patellar dislocations. Data on redislocation rates, functional outcomes using the Kujala score, and complication rates were recorded. A meta‐analysis was used to pool the mean postoperative Kujala score, as well as calculate the proportion of patients sustaining redislocation episodes using a random effects model. Quality assessment of included studies was performed for all included studies using the MINORS and Detsky scores. Results A total of 19 studies and 1,165 patients were included in this review. The pooled mean redislocation rate in 14 studies comprising 734 patients in the rehabilitation group was 30% (95% CI 25–36%, I 2 = 67%). Moreover, the pooled mean redislocation rate in 5 studies comprising 318 patients undergoing early MPFL reconstruction was 7% (95% CI 2–17%, I 2 = 70%). The pooled mean postoperative Kujala anterior knee pain score in 7 studies comprising 332 patients in the rehabilitation group was 81 (95% CI 78–85, I 2 = 78%), compared to a score of 87 (95% CI 85–89, I 2 = 0%, Fig. 4) in 3 studies comprising 54 patients in the reconstruction group. Conclusion Management of acute first‐time patellar dislocations with MPFL reconstruction resulted in a lower rate of redislocation of 7% in the reconstruction group vs 30% in the rehabilitation group and a higher Kujala score compared to the rehabilitation group. The information this review provides will help surgeons guide their decision to choose early MPFL reconstruction versus rehabilitation when treating patients with first‐time patellar dislocations and may guide future studies on the topic. Level of evidence IV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it