MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

CCTG BL13 a randomized phase II trial assessing trimodality therapy with or without adjuvant durvalumab to treat patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NCT03768570).

2022· article· en· W4281609415 on OpenAlexaffabout
Wassim Kassouf, Simon J. Crabb, Ignacio Durán, Michael Brundage, M. Neil Reaume, Alice Dragomir, Alexander W. Wyatt, Francisco Emilio Vera Badillo, Himu Lukka, Tamim Niazi, Luís Souhami, Srikala S. Sridhar, Gareth Griffiths, Doris Howell, Harriet Richardson, Marina Djurfeldt, Keyue Ding, Wendy R. Parulekar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoJewish General HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill UniversityPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreOttawa HospitalQueen's UniversityJuravinski Cancer CentreMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDurvalumabBladder cancerCystectomyOncologyRadiation therapyInternal medicineClinical endpointCancerImmunotherapyPopulationChemotherapyUrologyRandomized controlled trialNivolumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS4619 Background: Immunotherapy improves outcomes in the advanced (Bellmunt 2019; Powles 2020) as well as in the adjuvant setting post cystectomy (Bajorin 2021) for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients. Trimodality treatment (TMT) consisting of transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may be considered an alternative to radical cystectomy in MIBC. The role of radiotherapy and chemotherapy as immune system stimulants provides a rationale to evaluate the anticancer activity of checkpoint inhibitors in this patient population. Durvalumab, an anti PDL1 inhibitor, administered after CRT leads to improvement in PFS and OS in patients with locally advanced NSCLC, which further supports the rationale for this study (Antonia 2017, 2018). We hypothesized that durvalumab will improve outcomes in patients with MIBC when administered in the adjuvant setting after completion of trimodality therapy. Methods: CCTG BL13 is a Canadian Cancer Trials Group, randomized phase II trial in patients with stage T2-T4a N0M0, urothelial carcinoma treated with TURBT followed by radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy. Treatment arms consist of durvalumab 1500 mg IV q 4 weeks for 12 months versus surveillance. The primary objective: to compare disease free survival (DFS) between arms (RECIST 1.1, investigator assessed). Secondary endpoints include a non muscle-invasive bladder cancer recurrence rate (< T2); locoregional control rate; overall survival; bladder intact DFS, patterns of disease recurrence; metastasis free survival; safety; quality of life ; economics evaluation. A pilot sub study (BL13F) has been activated and will evaluate the feasibility of electronic real-time patient self-reporting of immunotherapy related symptomatic adverse events using the SYMPTOM-IQ Tool on the uMotif Mobile Health Application (APP). Statistical Design: Randomization 1:1 balanced for stratification factors: ECOG PS; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; radiation field extent; T2 vs T3/T4; centre. Assuming a 2-year DFS rate 65% for patients on the control arm and estimated 12% improvement in the 2-year DFS rate (65% to 77% (HR 0.61)) with 80% power using a 1-sided 10% level test requires a sample size of 190 including 5% drop out rate. Conduct to Date: Study activation Dec 2018. Enrollment as of January 31 2022: 49. The DSMC reviewed and recommended trial continuation in November 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT03768570.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.489
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→