MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281614799 · doi:10.1016/j.rec.2022.05.006

2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: Developed by the Task Force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

2022· article· en· W4281614799 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Alec Vahanian, Friedhelm Beyersdorf, Fabien Praz, Milan Milojevic, Stephan Baldus, Johann Bauersachs, Davide Capodanno, Lenard Conradi, Michele De Bonis, Ruggero De Paulis, Victoria Delgado, Nick Freemantle, Martine Gilard, Kristina H. Haugaa, Anders Jeppsson, Peter Jüni, Luc Piérard, Bernard Prendergast, Rafael Sádaba, Christophe Tribouilloy

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Española de Cardiología (English Edition) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersErasmus Universitair Medisch Centrum RotterdamArts and Humanities Research CouncilUniwersytet Śląski w KatowicachŚląski Uniwersytet Medyczny w KatowicachUniversitätsklinikum KölnTürk Kardiyoloji DerneğiInternational Medical UniversityBritish Cardiovascular SocietyMedizinischen Hochschule HannoverUniversitetet i OsloUniversity of TorontoCleveland ClinicUniversity College LondonInselspital, Universitätsspital BernSahlgrenska UniversitetssjukhusetUniversiteit LeidenSociedad Española de CardiologíaUniversity of Bern
Keywordsvalvular heart diseaseCardiologyTask forceMedicineInternal medicineDiseaseDisease managementPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Guidelines •

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations522
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207