Measurements of the number of specified and unspecified cells in the shoot apical meristem during a plastochron in rice (Oryza sativa) reveal the robustness of cellular specification process in plant development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The shoot apical meristem (SAM) is composed of a population of stem cells giving rise to the aboveground parts of plants. It maintains itself by controlling the balance of cell proliferation and specification. Although knowledge of the mechanisms maintaining the SAM has been accumulating, the processes of cellular specification to form leaves and replenishment of unspecified cells in the SAM during a plastochron (the time interval between which two successive leaf primordia are formed) is still obscure. In this study, we developed a method to quantify the number of specified and unspecified cells in the SAM and used it to elucidate the dynamics of cellular specification in the SAM during a plastochron in rice. OSH1 is a KNOX (KNOTTED1-like homeobox) gene in rice that is expressed in the unspecified cells in the SAM, but not in specified cells. Thus, we could visualize and count the nuclei of unspecified cells by fluorescent immunohistochemical staining with an anti-OSH1 antibody followed by fluorescein isothiocyanate detection. By double-staining with propidium iodide (which stains all nuclei) and then overlaying the images, we could also detect and count the specified cells. By using these measurements in combination with morphological observation, we defined four developmental stages of SAM that portray cellular specification and replenishment of unspecified cells in the SAM during a plastochron. In addition, through the analysis of mutant lines with altered size and shape of the SAM, we found that the number of specified cells destined to form a leaf primordium is not affected by mild perturbations of meristem size and shape. Our study highlights the dynamism and flexibility in stem cell maintenance in the SAM during a plastochron and the robustness of plant development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".