MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281620354 · doi:10.3233/shti220086

OpenMRS Analytics Engine: A FHIR Based Approach

2022· article· en· W4281620354 on OpenAlexaff
Allan Kimaina, Jonathan Dick, Bashir Sadjad

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in health technology and informatics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsGoogle (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalyticsInteroperabilityScalabilityComputer sciencePipeline (software)Data scienceArchitectureDatabaseWorld Wide WebOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the Electronic Health Record (EHR) data keeps growing in volume at an unprecedented rate, there is an increasing need for a more collaborative and scalable approach for designing and engineering clinical data pipelines. To address these two critical needs, we present a scalable analytics pipeline architecture, designed from the bottom-up to harness the power of FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) for improving collaborative efforts in health data analytics and indicator reporting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.249
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in health technology and informaticsSame topicScientific Computing and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207